Saturday, March 19, 2011
earthquake, civil wars, chaos, turmoils.....what's next?
Riotous demonstrations and horrible earthquake aftermaths had been the top headlines in almost all the newspapers and news programs the past weeks. I witnessed the tragedy that befallen Japan, one of the countries with the highest and fast economic growth. The economy will be greatly fluctuated because of the calamity. Eventually, this will lead to some disadvantages in the countries they pact with. Philippines to be specific benefits so much from the OFWs who are working in Japan through money remittances. Ergo, the earthquake calamity means unemployment to a lot of Japanese and Filipino workers, then this leads to the declination of the economy, both to that of Japan and Philippines.
"They want to eradicate from their lives the entire apparatus of the regimes: the secret police, the militias, the culture of fear and the culture of torture.
But there's something else going on in the Arab world right now: the uprisings are also targeting the sons of the dictators.
The sins of the fathers are indeed being visited upon the sons and, in most cases, justifiably so as the sons have been key players in the brutality that has kept the regimes, and the corruption that has characterised them, in place."
Juxtaposed to the earthquake calamities that shaken the economic threads of the world are the incessant wars happening in Libya and its neighboring countries. as we all know, Libya is under the absolute power of the dictator Muzzafar Gadaffi. He had been ruling Libya for 41 years now and whose strict and personalized autocratic power caused social asphyxia to the Libyan, eventually lead to their uprising against him. It was a also apparent that his family also decides in all the critical business and economic transactions. the approval form his son's and daughters had become mandatory before the ingression to these agreements. the best part is, these are not transparent to the people.Libyan economy and all the other countries transacting with them will be greatly affected because of this political turmoils. Philippines in particular purchase oil in Libya. So in the event of Gadaffis dethronement, the oil prices will be indisputably affected. since he won't take control of the primary product their country is producing. aside from that, the continuous turmoil will withdraw economic transactions by partnering countries, specially those who buy oil from them.
***
P.S.
I personally admire not Gadaffis eccentric fashion sense but his guts to wear those. it really reflected who he is and what kind of ruling he does: Personal and out-of-fashion. Libyans should still be thankful that Gadaffi do not interfere with their closets and PERSONALLY decides for their everyday outfits. that would be a credible reason to a more violent uprising (*Libyans, even Dior and Tyra Banks will join you if that happens.)
and this is the question everyone should be concerned of aside from what will happen to Libya and to other neighboring countries and to the world economy....WHO DESIGN GADAFFI'S BIZZARE CLOTHES??
what if Gadaffi is not really a dictator? but a puppet dictator dictated by a dictating puppeteer slash frustrated fashion designer?? the reason perhaps why he's acting such is because of the clothes he wear. these clothes might be enchanted by some spell made by the designer. then every time Gadaffi wears them, he has been somewhat controlled by this designer, he transforms to a heartless, stoic, obnoxious dictator! so the real culprit of all this chaos is none other than the designer! the disturbing problem aside from the economic trouble is....Who is Gadaffi's Fashion controller??
Evidences:
ANOTHER "FASHIONISTA" DICTATOR:
when Imelda met Muammar. could it be that they were talking about
world domination through the use of.. FASHION? what you think?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- Cyrella Racemiflora
- once in a while you chance to meet people from the inside universe of their own.
wow!..this is such a creative write up!
ReplyDeleteKeep on blogging!:D
:p thank you sir... thought you wouldn't like it because the later part has nothing to do with economics but just frivolous ideas. :)
ReplyDelete